Produced By: Ensombl
Financial advice is most often framed in numbers—how much to invest, how best to optimize tax strategies, or how to allocate assets for retirement. Yet beneath the spreadsheets and charts lies a hidden layer of personal beliefs, emotions, and lived experiences that govern how individuals handle money. In many cases, traditional advice focused solely on logical and external strategies may fail to generate lasting change or client satisfaction if these deeper psychological elements remain unaddressed.
Money coaching, a specialized approach that explores the emotional, behavioral, and psychological aspects of individuals’ relationships with money, offers an invaluable complement to standard financial advice. It is a field growing in popularity worldwide, and one in which a number of advisors are seeking further education or partnership opportunities. In this article, we explore the value of money coaching, its theoretical underpinnings, the framework of a typical coaching engagement, and how professionalism and ethics guide both money coaches and financial advisors in delivering the highest standards of client care.
This exploration is based in part on a conversation that took place between host James Wrigley—a financial advisor and Principal at Melbourne-based firm First Financial—and Karen Eley, a Certified Money Coach and former financial advisor with 16 years of experience in traditional advice. Karen transitioned to focus on the more personal and psychological side of finance, helping individuals and couples understand the deep-seated beliefs that shape their decision-making. Their dialogue highlights key professional considerations, including how best to serve clients ethically, responsibly, and compassionately in the realm of personal finance.
Money coaching is not to be confused with the typical cash flow or budgeting service many financial planning firms offer. While there is often some overlap, money coaching centers on the idea that one’s early-life experiences, emotional triggers, learned beliefs, and even past traumas inform the way they handle finances today. Traditional financial advice can tell you what to do—“Invest in these assets,” “Consider a specific superannuation strategy,” or “Build this insurance portfolio”—but does not necessarily address why certain individuals procrastinate on investing, persistently overspend, or shy away from decisions that would seemingly benefit them in the long run.
Money coaching leverages fields like psychology, neuroscience, and therapy-informed strategies in tandem with more practical tools. It aims to uncover and then reframe harmful money beliefs or behaviors, substituting them with healthier habits. In a professional sense, this process must be undertaken ethically and responsibly: a money coach is not a mental-health professional, nor do they attempt to replace licensed psychologists or therapists. Rather, they specialize in the nexus between financial literacy, behavior change, and personal development—referring clients out to other professionals where necessary.
Karen outlines that the formal training she received comes from institutions such as the Money Coaching Institute in California, where coaches learn a four-session framework blending neuroscience, emotional processing, and financial education. Other qualified training pathways, such as those created by Dr. Brad Klontz, Catherine Morgan, and others, also exist. The result is a structured system akin to an advice process, albeit focusing on one’s personal money story and psyche rather than purely external financial figures.
Financial advisors are rigorously trained in technical competence: they must pass exams, keep track of regulatory updates, and follow strict compliance guidelines. Their fundamental aim is to provide high-quality, strategic financial guidance. Yet, as James and Karen’s conversation underscores, the emotional side of money can decisively impact whether or not a client follows even the best of advice.
Where a traditional advisor sees a “logical plan”—based on prudent asset allocation, taxation strategies, or risk management—a client may feel significant emotional barriers preventing them from acting. These barriers could emerge from:
Advisors frequently encounter these issues during onboarding. Karen noted that a telling sign might be “analysis paralysis,” where a client who intellectually agrees with the merits of an investment plan inexplicably does not implement it. Another might be persistent overspending—despite having a “perfect” budget. Rather than the standard approach of repeating the logic or adjusting the plan’s recommendations, it may be more appropriate to refer the client to a specialized money coach who can help address the underlying behaviors.
From a professional ethics standpoint, the advisor serves the client best by recognizing the limits of their own skill set. Financial planners are held to a fiduciary standard or similar professional code of ethics, depending on the jurisdiction. When an advisor notices that the client needs deeper behavioral or emotional support, an ethical approach involves making a referral or collaborating with a money coach trained to explore those sensitive topics. This aligns with the principle of acting in the client’s best interest and ensuring they receive the most relevant expertise.
A typical money coaching engagement can last anywhere from several weeks to a few months, featuring regular sessions—often between four to six—where coach and client meet to explore that client’s history and the factors shaping their financial choices. Karen typically uses a three-month model with six structured sessions, integrating:
Professionally and ethically, the money coach follows a structured process that is transparent to the client. Confidentiality is paramount: revelations about past traumas or family conflicts are deeply personal and must be treated with the same seriousness and professionalism as any sensitive financial information. The coach maintains clear boundaries about what they can and cannot offer, referring the client to mental-health professionals if more specialized therapeutic interventions become necessary.
From a professional standpoint, financial advisors working alongside money coaches or incorporating money-coaching principles into their practice is a commendable way to raise standards of client care. Collaboration adheres to fundamental ethical principles of:
Imagine a couple—let’s call them Mark and Sarah—who have come to you, the financial advisor, seeking to make the most of their combined high incomes. Despite earning well into six figures and having manageable household expenses, they have saved little for retirement or long-term goals, and regularly struggle with credit card debt.
At the discovery meeting, you ask your standard questions:
But you also inquire, “What were some lessons each of you learned about money growing up?” Mark hesitates, eyes cast downward, explaining that in his childhood home, money discussions always ended in shouting matches between his parents. Sarah, meanwhile, shrugs and says, “I don’t know, I never really managed it—my parents just said, ‘We can’t afford it,’ or told me not to worry about it.”
Over several meetings, you notice that Mark becomes visibly stressed discussing budgets, while Sarah is uninterested in tracking spending—she rationalizes purchases by saying she “deserves” them after her stressful week at work.
After you present a comprehensive, fact-based financial plan recommending prudent measures (like building an emergency fund, reining in discretionary spending, and establishing a regular investment program), progress stalls. Mark and Sarah repeatedly put off signing paperwork and continue racking up new credit card bills. You sense that the typical approach—explaining compound interest, modeling future outcomes, stressing the importance of risk management—isn’t moving the needle.
Here, the ethical and professional approach may be to introduce the concept of money coaching. You explain that you have observed consistent emotional roadblocks inhibiting their follow-through. They may wish to spend several weeks or months with a professional who can help them understand their individual money stories, manage the anxiety triggered by discussing finances, and cultivate healthier spending and saving patterns. Once they have made headway in coaching, they can come back to you, feeling more ready to implement a plan.
Far from abdicating your responsibility, you are fulfilling your fiduciary duty—or best interest duty—by aligning them with the services they truly need. If they do complete the coaching, they often return with renewed clarity, unencumbered by the baggage that led to avoidance or overspending. This synergy of expertise respects each practitioner’s professional domain and, most importantly, respects the client’s wellbeing.
Money coaches themselves must operate within stringent ethical frameworks, even though they are not always regulated in the same manner as financial advisors. Key responsibilities include:
As financial planning continues to evolve, the integration of behavioral coaching, financial psychology, and money coaching points to a future where professionals must know more than formulas for wealth accumulation. Advisors who embrace this approach are often best positioned to build deeper trust, as clients sense their empathy and interest in the “whole person” rather than merely the bank balances and returns.
Financial wellbeing is increasingly seen as part of holistic wellness—much like physical or mental health. In the corporate sphere, as Karen points out, many employers and HR departments have begun offering financial wellness programs to address stress and productivity issues. Having money coaches and financial advisors collaborate in these programs ensures employees do not merely learn how to budget, but also why they might overspend or ignore key financial responsibilities.
Moreover, professionalism in this blended sphere means upholding and sometimes exceeding regulatory standards. For instance, in Australia, advisors must align with the Financial Planners and Advisers Code of Ethics, or, in other jurisdictions, comparable guidelines. While the code does not explicitly mention “money coaching,” it requires that client interests, client comprehension, and advisor competence are central. Money coaches, in turn, typically adopt a code of conduct, even if it is self-imposed or enforced by their training bodies, to ensure they practice with integrity and maintain high professional standards.
The conversation between James Wrigley and Karen Eley invites a broader reflection on how financial professionals can ethically meet the diverse needs of their clients. At times, a solid statement of advice, step-by-step budgeting tools, and well-researched investment strategies are enough to help clients thrive. But for many, the real obstacles lie much deeper, in unseen beliefs and emotional dynamics that sabotage their best intentions or spawn chronic anxiety.
Money coaching responds to these complexities with a structured yet empathetic process that acknowledges human behavior is rarely linear or purely rational. By collaborating with money coaches—or incorporating money-coaching principles themselves—advisors can enhance their service offerings and uphold the highest ethical standards of putting the client’s needs first.
In doing so, all parties benefit. Clients gain newfound freedom and peace of mind, often overcoming habits they have carried since childhood. Advisors and coaches, working in concert, deepen their impact, foster trust, and create lasting transformations that extend well beyond a single financial plan. Ultimately, such integrative approaches point to a future in which financial advice merges seamlessly with behavioral insight, delivering results that are not only numerically sound but genuinely life-changing.
In this way, professionalism and ethics come to life: by integrating awareness of both practical numbers and the human dimensions of money, financial professionals provide empathetic, thoroughly informed guidance. Through partnerships or by expanding their own skill sets, advisors can help clients achieve not just wealth, but genuine financial wellbeing—supported by an approach that respects the complexity and dignity of each individual’s relationship with money.
Accreditation Points Allocation:
0.10 Technical Competence
0.10 Client Care and Practice
0.10 Regulatory Compliance and Consumer Protection
0.10 Professionalism and Ethics
0.40 Total CPD Points