Produced By: Ensombl
In today’s ever-evolving financial landscape, advisors grapple with balancing a rapidly changing market backdrop, clients’ best interests, and the pursuit of consistent performance. This article synthesizes a conversation hosted by James Whelan (Managing Director, Barclay Pearce Capital’s Wealth Management Team) with guests Thomas Taw (Head of the APAC Investment Strategy Team) and James Waterworth (Head of Intermediary Relationships) on the Ensemble platform. From the role of central banks to emerging market opportunities—and from geopolitical risks to the looming U.S. presidential election—this piece provides a high-level overview of where markets may be headed and how advisors might think about their roles and responsibilities with the utmost professionalism and ethics.
Disclaimer: The information provided is for general informational purposes and does not constitute personal financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any financial product. Always conduct thorough due diligence and consider your clients’ individual circumstances before making investment decisions.
From the vantage point of financial advisors, the second half of 2024 and the anticipated developments in 2025 present both promise and potential pitfalls. Inflation has been a major theme; however, early signs indicate that its once-rapid ascent may be moderating. Central banks, led by the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed), have shifted from raising rates at a historically aggressive pace to contemplating (and in some cases, executing) rate cuts. This policy pivot, alongside other structural market drivers such as the global energy transition and technological advances, has begun to shape capital allocation strategies.
Thomas Taw underscores this point: central banks globally are at an inflection point, where the question is no longer if they will cut rates, but how far and how fast. Yet, the data driving those decisions—specifically inflation and labor market statistics—can be lagging indicators, making it challenging to predict with precision. Nonetheless, both Taw and Waterworth stress the importance of continuous monitoring: when central banks change course, markets react, presenting both opportunities and risks.
In addition to central bank policy, geopolitics looms large. From ongoing tensions in the Middle East to the complexities of U.S.–China relations, macro events can significantly influence everything from commodity prices to the flow of capital into or out of specific countries. With the U.S. presidential election on the horizon, advisors face yet another layer of uncertainty, prompting increased vigilance around portfolio construction and risk management.
Throughout these market ups and downs, the guiding principle for advisors remains the same: serving clients’ best interests with integrity and discipline. In that spirit, this article aims to place a spotlight on maintaining professionalism and ethical rigor amid rapidly shifting global macroeconomic conditions.
At the start of 2024, the Fed’s stance on monetary policy shifted from steadfast rate hikes—intended to quell inflation—to the beginning of a cutting cycle. The magnitude of these cuts has been surprising to some economists. While consensus had mostly assumed a measured, 25-basis-point approach, the Fed’s 50-basis-point cut caught many observers off guard.
Why the surprise?
Advisors may wonder: does such monetary easing foretell an even more robust stock market, particularly in the United States? Taw and Waterworth caution that, while a rate-cutting cycle can buoy equity markets, it is critical to look at forward earnings estimates. If valuations rise faster than earnings can justify, equity markets may be “priced for perfection,” introducing volatility risk.
In Australia, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) faces its own set of inflation concerns. While the market widely expects rate cuts in 2025, the RBA has signaled it might be slower and more cautious than either the Fed or the European Central Bank (ECB). The Australian economy also battles cost-of-living challenges, prompting many local investors to question when they might find relief in their mortgage repayments.
Meanwhile, the ECB and the Bank of England are also eyeing conditions in their respective economies. Both Europe and the U.K. have unique inflation pressures—especially tied to energy costs. Thus, their rate cuts (or the tempo at which they occur) might differ from the Fed’s, reflecting the localized nature of inflation drivers.
Japan stands out for its unconventional approach. Over the last decade, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) has rarely followed the global pack in monetary policy. For many years, Japanese interest rates have been near zero, effectively supporting a longstanding carry trade—where investors borrow at negligible rates in yen to invest in higher-yielding assets elsewhere. Now, as global rates moderate, investors are recalculating the attractiveness of that trade. Nonetheless, many analysts, including those at BlackRock, remain optimistic about Japan’s equities market, citing improving corporate governance and an enormous pool of domestic savings (estimated at $7 trillion USD) that could flow into equities.
Professional Consideration:
Advisors should weigh each central bank’s rate trajectory carefully, recognizing that the synchronized global downturn many had predicted in 2023 did not fully materialize. Ethical conduct demands that advisors maintain transparency with clients regarding the inherent uncertainty in these forecasts and the complexities of central bank actions.
China’s economic recovery, once expected to be swift, has been slower and more volatile than anticipated. Recent unexpected policy announcements underscore the risks of making bold directional bets on Chinese equities. For a period, many global investors remained heavily underweight China, citing regulatory crackdowns and geopolitical tension. Then, a wave of stimulus measures, announced by Beijing to jumpstart growth, triggered a sudden upswing in Chinese equities.
Key Takeaway:
The broader EM landscape has evolved. Often, “emerging markets” as a term still conjures images of commodity-driven economies in Latin America. In reality, EM indices now comprise roughly 75% Asian equities, with major contributions from India, South Korea, Taiwan, and China.
When constructing portfolios, a common approach is to buy broad EM exposure while separately adjusting one’s weighting in China. This approach facilitates tactical positioning—allowing advisors to overweight or underweight China depending on policy developments—without forgoing the growth potential in India, South Korea, or Taiwan.
Professional Insight:
Advisors have an ethical obligation to educate clients that “EM” is no longer monolithic. Each region or country operates within its own economic cycle, regulatory environment, and consumer demand pattern. Providing nuanced explanations helps clients appreciate the underlying complexities and potential volatility.
In commodity markets, gold stands out. Traditionally regarded as a safe-haven asset, gold often responds favorably to geopolitical tensions and is also influenced by the relative strength of the U.S. dollar. If the dollar weakens, gold typically gains momentum. Moreover, the prospect of U.S. elections and any associated geopolitical jitters can further boost demand for gold ETFs.
Other commodities, such as lithium or bauxite, have garnered attention linked to the clean energy revolution (e.g., lithium for batteries). However, interest has waxed and waned over the past several years, partly because performance can be choppy. If geopolitical events disrupt supply chains, certain metals might rally, but they can also experience steep pullbacks if global demand falters.
ESG investing, once the industry buzzword, has faced evolving interest. Although the acronym “ESG” (Environmental, Social, and Governance) might not appear as frequently in today’s headlines, the principles behind it remain relevant, especially the transition to renewable energy sources.
Challenges and Considerations:
Professionally, advisors should balance the ethical imperative of considering the environment’s long-term well-being with their fiduciary duty to seek appropriate returns. Conversations with clients can probe beyond simple ESG screenings (where the biggest polluters are simply excluded) to more nuanced strategies that embrace engagement with high-impact companies aiming to transition.
The period from 2016 to 2020 was marked by heightened political rhetoric, trade conflicts, and surprises like major tax reforms. Markets proved resilient, with U.S. equities delivering strong returns, partly fueled by growth in technology companies.
However, the global economy in 2025 is notably different from 2016. Several structural shifts include:
According to Thomas Taw, the major dividing line for policy may be how a reelected President Trump (or a Trump-like Republican administration) handles tariffs and trade relations, especially with China. Additional or higher tariffs could exacerbate inflationary pressures by driving up the cost of imports, while also impacting global supply chains.
A Democratic administration, led by Vice President Kamala Harris if she were to secure the nomination and win, might continue the policy framework of the current White House. This scenario suggests potential continuity in clean energy initiatives, corporate taxation, and diplomatic approaches to trade.
Investment Implications:
Professional Responsibility:
Advisors should avoid speculation on political outcomes for short-term trades unless such strategies fit a client’s risk tolerance. Ethics and professionalism demand transparency about the unpredictability of politics and caution in extrapolating partisan agendas too far into the future.
Artificial Intelligence captured the imagination of investors earlier in 2024. Valuations of certain AI-linked companies soared, evoking memories of past technology booms. The initial excitement centered on semiconductor manufacturers—since AI workloads require specialized processing capacity. However, interest seems to have cooled in the latter half of the year.
Investors and analysts are now looking deeper into the stack:
Ethical Approach:
Advisors should counsel clients to maintain realistic expectations. While AI presents exciting long-term potential, short-term spikes in valuations based on news headlines can be misleading. A thorough analysis of a company’s revenue stream, scalability, and product pipeline is vital to making ethically sound investment recommendations.
One of the greatest ethical imperatives for financial advisors is setting and managing realistic client expectations. When central banks shift gears rapidly, or when a major geopolitical event occurs, clients may feel anxious—tempted to make impulsive portfolio decisions. Advisors play a crucial role in maintaining discipline and offering education, reminding clients that investing requires a long-term perspective.
Whether in emerging markets or new technologies, thorough due diligence is non-negotiable. Although many broad-brush narratives might promise lucrative returns (e.g., “India is the next China,” or “AI will revolutionize every industry”), an advisor must scrutinize fundamental data, valuations, governance standards, and competitive landscapes before recommending any strategy.
Even the most well-intended strategy can be undermined by a lack of transparency. Disclosing potential conflicts of interest, fees, and the inherent risks of each investment is a legal and ethical necessity. Advisors must stay updated on the regulations in their jurisdiction—be it Australia, the U.S., or anywhere else—and integrate those rules into their daily practice.
Above all, ethical advisors uphold their fiduciary duty: always placing clients’ best interests above their own. In a world of complex, often opaque financial instruments, an advisor’s moral compass must guide the conversation—ensuring that the products and strategies proposed genuinely align with each client’s goals, risk tolerance, and values.
As we navigate the close of 2024 and brace for the unpredictability of 2025, the interplay of central bank decisions, geopolitical tensions, technological evolution, and electoral outcomes can reshape markets at a moment’s notice. Advisors who adhere to rigorous professional standards and ethical practices will be best equipped to guide clients through the uncertainty.
The conversation among James Whelan, Thomas Taw, and James Waterworth underscores the importance of a global perspective. BlackRock’s extensive data points and experience shine a light on the nuanced ways in which various market segments—be it U.S. equities, emerging markets, or commodities—ebb and flow under shifting macro conditions. Advisors, therefore, must remain agile and informed. Whether it is the Fed’s next rate move, China’s latest policy pronouncement, or a pivot in the U.S. political landscape, the greatest asset an advisor possesses is the ability to integrate robust analysis with a steadfast moral framework.
In the final analysis, success in this industry hinges not on having a crystal ball, but on placing clients at the heart of every recommendation, maintaining open lines of communication, and never losing sight of the ethical obligations that define the advisory profession. By combining informed macro perspectives with an unwavering commitment to ethical practice, advisors can help clients meet their financial objectives, even amid the most tumultuous times.
Accreditation Points Allocation:
0.10 Technical Competence
0.10 Client Care and Practice
0.10 Professionalism and Ethics
0.30 Total CPD Points